Whether respondents acted in a conspiracy to violate petitioner's constitutional rights

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether respondents, Quentin T. Sumner, Calvin Woodard, Keith Stone and magistrate Kenneth Barnes, acted in a conspiracy when appellee Calvin Woodard trespassed on private property of petitioner, made an entry, without a warrant onto personal premise of petitioner, searched and seized his property and invaded his privacy in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Then acted with active connivance in the making of the failed to appear false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination clearly sufficient to constitute denial of rights protected by the Equal Protection Clause to deprive the petitioner of liberty or property; handcuffed the appellant; placed appellant in the cruiser and hauled him down to the magisrate's office and placed him under a $13,000.00 cash bond withiut due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. ii . PRECEEDINGS AND RELATED CASES . All the parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page RELATED CASES Armstrong v North Carolina, et al No. 5:12-CV-00805-BO; United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina; Judgment entered on June 22, 2021. Armstrong v North Carolina, et al United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Judgment entered November 17, 2021 There is no parent or publicly held company owing 10 % or more of the corporate stock. . TABLE OF CONTENT ; Questions Presented 2.0... Disclosure statement Table Of ell Opinion BelOW ou... Jurisdiction statements