No. 21-883
Tags: chickasaw-nation conviction-finality criminal-procedure federal-native-american-relations habeas-corpus indian-major-crimes-act judicial-precedent McGirt-retroactivity mcgirt-v-oklahoma Oklahoma-law retroactivity substantive-rule
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma applies retroactively to convictions
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), applies retroactively to convictions that were final when McGirt was decided. ii RULE 14.1 (b) STATEMENT The parties in the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals were Petitioner Glen D. Gore and Respondent State of Oklahoma. The following is a list of all directly
Docket Entries
2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2021-12-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Glen D. Gore
Richard A. Simpson — Wiley Rein, LLP, Petitioner
Richard A. Simpson — Wiley Rein, LLP, Petitioner