No. 21-884
Relisted (2)
Tags: criminal-procedure district-court factual-developments first-step-act intervening-factual-developments intervening-legal-developments legal-developments reduced-sentence sentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding to impose a reduced sentence under the First Step Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when deciding if it should “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, 21 U.S.C. § 841 note, a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments. I
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Concepcion</i> v. <i>United States</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-14
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2022-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 14, 2022.
2022-01-05
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2022 to February 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
Attorneys
Blake Fields
Max D. Stern — Todd & Weld LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent