No. 21-888

Intel Corporation v. VLSI Technology LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Federal Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-15
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Waived Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-law agency-rule agency-rulemaking arbitrary-or-capricious federal-circuit inter-partes-review leahy-smith-act leahy-smith-america-invents-act notice-and-comment-rulemaking patent patent-review
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Patent Trademark JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may review, by appeal or mandamus, a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denying a petition for inter partes review of a patent, where review is sought on the grounds that the denial rested on an agency rule that exceeds the PTO's authority under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, is arbitrary or capricious, or was adopted without required notice-and-comment rulemaking

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit may review, by appeal or mandamus, a decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denying a petition for inter partes review of a patent, where review is sought on the grounds that the denial rested on an agency rule that exceeds the PTO’s authority under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, is arbitrary or capricious, or was adopted without required notice-andcomment rulemaking. @

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-03-01
Reply of petitioner Intel Corporation filed. (Distributed)
2022-02-14
Brief of respondent Federal Respondent in opposition filed.
2022-01-14
Brief amici curiae of Unified Patents, LLC, et al. filed.
2021-12-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 14, 2022, for all respondents.
2021-12-22
Waiver of right of respondent VLSI Technology LLC to respond filed.
2021-12-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2022 to February 14, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2022)
2021-10-27
Application (21A115) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 24, 2021.
2021-10-25
Application (21A115) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 24, 2021 to December 24, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.

Attorneys

Federal Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Intel Corporation
Catherine Mary Agnes CarrollWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Petitioner
Catherine Mary Agnes CarrollWilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, Petitioner
Unified Patents, LLC, et al.
William G. JenksJenks IP Law, Amicus
William G. JenksJenks IP Law, Amicus
VLSI Technology LLC
Nathan Nobu LowensteinLowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Respondent
Nathan Nobu LowensteinLowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Respondent