No. 21-892

Micah James Patterson v. Virginia

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2021-12-16
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-jurisdiction constitution constitutional-amendment criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment grand-jury judicial-authority
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does any court have the authority to amend the United States Constitution by fiat and extinguish a defendant's Fifth Amendment rights?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review A. Does any court have the authority to amend the United States Constitution by fiat and extinguish a defendant’s Fifth Amendment rights? i PETITION FOR CERTIORARI List of All

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent Virginia to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-10-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2022)
PetitionAppendix

Attorneys

Micah James Patterson
Dale Reese Jensen — Dale Jensen, PLC, Petitioner
Dale Reese Jensen — Dale Jensen, PLC, Petitioner
Virginia
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Virginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Andrew Nathan Ferguson — Virginia Office of the Attorney General, Respondent