No. 21-895
John Rodrigues, Jr. v. County of Hawaii, et al.
Tags: civil-rights due-process federal-preemption firearms firearms-law law-enforcement leosa preemption qualified-retired-officer statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment FifthAmendment CriminalProcedure Securities Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does LEOSA (18 U.S.C. Sec. 966C) preempt State firearms laws that prohibit the transport, carrying and possession of firearms by a Qualified Retired Law Enforcement Officer (QRLEO")"
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does LEOSA (18 U.S.C. Sec. 966C) preempt State firearms laws that prohibit the transport, carrying and possession of firearms by a Qualified Retired Law Enforcement Officer (““QRLEO”)?
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-02
Reply of petitioner John Rodrigues, Jr. filed.
2022-02-17
Brief of respondents County of Hawaii, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-01-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 17, 2022.
2022-01-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 18, 2022 to February 17, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2022) (Corrected brief uploaded 3/10/22)
Attorneys
County of Hawaii, et al.
John Rodrigues, Jr.
Ted H. S. Hong — Ted H. S. Hong, Attorney at Law, LLLC, Petitioner