Did the court below err in not considering the subject-matter-jurisdiction

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : 1. Did the court below err in not considering the issue of whether the District Court had subject matter : jurisdiction to consider the sole special defense upon which the court granted summary judgment? . 2. Did the decision of the court below in affirming : the decision of the District Court granting summary ; judgment. conflict with this Court’s decision in. Transunion, LLC v. Ramirez, ___ U.S. __, 141 S.Ct. 2190, 210 L.Ed.2d 568, 2021 WL 2599472 (June 25, 2021)? ; 3. Did the court below commit reversible error in affirming the decision of the District Court to revoke . Plaintiffs pro hac vice appearance? ; , 4. Did the court below err by refusing to consider Plaintiff's argument that he should have been permitted to appear pro se on behalf of his limited liability com; ; pany. 5. Should this court reconsider its holdings in Osborn v. Bank of the United States, 9 Wheat. 738, 22 : U.S. 738, 6 L.Ed 204 (1824); and Rowland v. Men’s Colony, Unit IT Men’s Advisory Council, 506 U.S. 194, 113 S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed 2nd 756 (1993) to the extent the decisions’ prohibition of single owner, single employee, . limited liability corporations from appearing in federal courts except through licensed attorneys, violates ; the due process clause, and equal protection component of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution? ii : :