No. 21-942

Clark County Bancorporation v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Bank of Clark County

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-12-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-claims declaratory-judgment federal-common-law firrea jurisdiction jurisdictional-rule tax-refund
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw DueProcess FifthAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-04-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Memorandum conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case presents an important issue of the failure of lower courts to adhere to relevant Supreme Court decisions, Rodriguez v. FDIC, as Receiver for United Western Bank, 589 U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct 713 (2020) (“Rodriguez”), and United States v. Wong, 575 U.S. 402 (2015) (“Wong”). The questions presented are: 1. Whether the Ninth Circuit Memorandum conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez, which confirmed that the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (“FIRREA”) is not applicable to tax refund determination declaratory judgment actions between a parent and the FDIC as Receiver for a subsidiary pursuant to tax allocation agreements. 2. Whether the Ninth Circuit Memorandum engaged in federal common lawmaking contrary to the Supreme Court decision in Rodriguez, by disregarding the United States Code, and the express jurisdiction provided therein by 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(6)(A)Gi). 3. Whether the Ninth Circuit Memorandum conflicts with the Supreme Court decision in Wong, whereby the FIRREA claims filing date provision is an administrative claims processing rule and is not jurisdictional. u RULE 29.6 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Clark County Bancorporation has no parent corporation, and no publicly held company owns 10% or more of its stock. RELATED CASES 1. Clark Cnty. Bancorporation v. FDIC as Receiver, No. 19-35097, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Judgment entered May 21, 2021. 2. Clark Cnty. Bancorporation v. FDIC as Receiver, No. C14-5816; C14-5852, consolidated under No. C14-5816, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Judgment entered January 10, 2019 (C14-5852 had been commenced in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Clark Cnty. Bancorporation v. FDIC as Receiver, et al., No. 14-01304, thereafter transferred on October 27, 2014 from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and assigned therein No. C145852). 3. Clark Cnty. Bancorporation v. U.S. Dep't of Treasury, et al., No. 13-632, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. Judgment entered Sept. 19, 2014.

Docket Entries

2022-05-02
Petition DENIED.
2022-04-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
2022-04-07
Reply of petitioner Clark County Bancorporation filed.
2022-03-28
Brief of respondent Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Bank of Clark County in opposition filed.
2022-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 28, 2022.
2022-02-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 25, 2022 to March 28, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-01-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 25, 2022.
2022-01-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 26, 2022 to February 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 26, 2022)
2021-10-20
Application (21A92) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 23, 2021.
2021-10-15
Application (21A92) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 27, 2021 to December 23, 2021, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Clark County Bancorporation
James F. SullivanLogan, Vance, Sullivan & Kores LL P, Petitioner
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Bank of Clark County
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent