No. 21-945
Tags: confession criminal-confession criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence-exclusion fifth-amendment miranda-warning miranda-warnings misleading-jury witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2022-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can a criminal defendant's cross-examination of a witness for the State, designed to mislead the jury, open the door to the introduction of the defendant's voluntary confession when that confession was previously excluded due to an invalid Miranda waiver?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a criminal defendant's cross-examination of a witness for the State, designed to mislead the jury, open the door to the introduction of the defendant's voluntary confession when that confession was previously excluded due to an invalid Miranda waiver?
Docket Entries
2022-04-04
Petition DENIED.
2022-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2022.
2022-03-10
Reply of petitioner Wisconsin filed.
2022-02-25
Brief of respondent Manuel Garcia in opposition filed.
2022-01-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 25, 2022.
2022-01-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 26, 2022 to February 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-12-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 26, 2022)
Attorneys
Manuel Garcia
Sean O'Donnell Bosack — Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Respondent
Wisconsin
John Arthur Blimling — Wisconsin Department of Justice, Petitioner