No. 21-957

Marci M. Webber v. Illinois

Lower Court: Illinois
Docketed: 2021-12-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: civil-rights confinement due-process equal-protection fourteenth-amendment mental-health mental-health-detention ngri not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-02-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a State's indefinite confinement of an NGRI acquittee, who is no longer psychotic, mentally ill, a danger to herself or others, or in need of inpatient mental health care, constitutes punishment and is a significant deprivation of liberty that violates the due process and/or equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited by Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioner has been detained in a state mental health center since her bench trial in June 2012, which adjudicated her Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) for killing her young daughter. The predicate offense was committed while the Petitioner was acutely psychotic. For years, Petitioner has not been psychotic. In addition, the trial judge who sentenced and later conditionally released her, along with her medical treatment team where she is confined, both state that Petitioner is not mentally ill, not a danger to herself or others, and is not in need of inpatient mental health care. The State’s Attorney appealed the trial court’s order of conditional release. The Illinois Appellate Court reversed; the Petitioner was returned to confinement after nine days of freedom. The Illinois Supreme Court denied a Petition for Leave to Appeal. Whether a State’s indefinite confinement of an NGRI acquittee, who is no longer psychotic, mentally ill, a danger to herself or others, or in need of inpatient mental health care, constitutes punishment and is a significant deprivation of liberty that violates the due process and/or equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibited by Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71 (1992). u RELATED CASES STATEMENT ¢ People v. Webber, No. 127430, Illinois Supreme Court. Judgment entered September 29, 2021. ¢ People v. Webber, Case No. 127433, Illinois Supreme Court. Judgment entered August 4, 2021. ¢ People v. Webber, No. 2-19-1090, Illinois Appellate Court for the Second District. Judgment entered June 9, 2021. ¢ People v. Webber, No. 2-19-1090, Illinois Appellate Court for the Second District. Judgment entered December 20, 2019. ¢ People v. Webber, Case No. 10 CF2643, Circuit Court of DuPage County for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois. Judgement entered December 11, 2019. ¢ People v. Webber, No. 10 CF2648, Circuit Court of DuPage County for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois. Judgement entered September 18, 2019. ¢ People v. Webber, No. 2-17-0998, Ilinois Appellate Court for the Second District. Judgment entered August 1, 2019. ¢ People v. Webber, No. 10 CF 2648, Circuit Court of DuPage County for the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit of Illinois. Judgement entered November 13, 2017.

Docket Entries

2022-02-22
Petition DENIED.
2022-01-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
2022-01-13
Waiver of right of respondent People of the State of Illinois to respond filed.
2021-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 31, 2022)

Attorneys

Marci M. Webber
Thomas Cusack CroninCronin & Co., Ltd., Petitioner
Thomas Cusack CroninCronin & Co., Ltd., Petitioner
People of the State of Illinois
Lisa Anne HoffmanDuPage County State's Attorney's Office, Respondent
Lisa Anne HoffmanDuPage County State's Attorney's Office, Respondent