No. 21-959
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: criminal-jurisdiction due-process indian-country mcgirt-precedent mcgirt-v-oklahoma non-indian non-indian-crimes state-prosecution tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in Indian country. 2. Whether McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S.Ct. 2452 (2020), should be overruled. ii LIST OF PROCEEDINGS Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals F-2019-854 Joshua Lee Purdom, Appellant v. The State of Oklahoma, Appellee Date of Final Opinion: September 23, 2021 Oklahoma District Court (Hughes County) No. CF-2018-93 The State of Oklahoma, Plaintiff v. Joshua Lee Purdom, Defendant Date of Judgment and Sentence: November 5, 2019
Docket Entries
2022-08-01
JUDGMENT ISSUED
2022-08-01
MANDATE ISSUED
2022-06-30
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
2022-06-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Oklahoma</i> v. <i>Castro-Huerta</i>, 597 U. S. ___ (2022).
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2022-02-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/4/2022.
2022-01-31
Brief of respondent Joshua Lee Purdom in opposition filed.
2022-01-31
Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Joshua Lee Purdom.
2021-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 31, 2022)
Attorneys
Joshua Lee Purdom
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Zachary Charles Schauf — Jenner & Block, LLP, Respondent
Oklahoma
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Petitioner