Has the Trial Court accurately conclude that the Pervasive Bias which is evident in the states' justice systems, also extends even to this This Honorable Court — particularly when the litigant is either pro se, or worse, one who had the audacity to file suit against the profession's most sacred/ revered institution (the local Bar Association)?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : This case asks This Honorable Court to show that the Pervasive Bias in the state courts does not extend to this nation’s Highest Court. Here, a Butler ; County Judge “utilized” an Order of Court from Allegheny County, as the complete authority for the Dismissal of a civil case (related to damages caused by neighbors’ gross neglect of their trees). The dismissal was officially based solely on the basis that the Butler filing violated that Allegheny County Order which specifically prohibits Coulter from ' proceeding pro se (a.) even when transferring a case from federal court to state court following a finding of lack of diversity jurisdiction, or (b.) if any current defendant or claim has “any relationship (direct or indirect) to” any prior defendant or claim and (c.) requires Coulter receive (written) pre-filing permission to file even to for a transfer following a finding of lack of diversity or pay essentially $10,000 filing fee. 1. Has the Trial Court accurately conclude that the Pervasive Bias which is evident in the states’ justice systems, also extends even to this This Honorable Court — particularly when the litigant is either pro se, or worse, one who had the audacity to file suit against the profession’s most sacred/ revered institution (the local Bar Association)? 2. Do Rule 233.1 and its progeny (the Allegheny County Order) violate both 28 U.S. Code §13867 as ~ well as Due Process and Equal Protection? 3. Must This Court defend the Public and Justice System from attacks by biased state Rules and Orders including Pa. R.C.P. 233.1 and its progeny? . ’ 4. Does the complete denial of Appeals violate | Coulter’s Equal Protection and Due Process? . i. ; b. __— PARTIES IN THE STATE COURTS (63) Jean Coulter, Petitioner Gerri Volchko Paulisick, and Joseph R. Paulisick, Respondents Gi) The trial court — the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, Jean Coulter, Plaintiff v. Gerri Volchko Paulisick and Joseph R. Paulisick, Defendants, Civil Division case number A.D. No. 2020-10334. : The lower appellate court, Pennsylvania Superior Court, Jean Coulter, Petitioner v. Gerri : Volchko Paulisick and Joseph R. Paulisick, Respondents, case number 83 WDN 2020. . The state’s highest court, Pennsylvania Supreme Court, Jean Coulter, Petitioner v. Gerri Volchko Paulisick and Joseph R. Paulisick, Respondents, case number 362 WAL 2020. : c.