No. 21-977

Robert E. Kovacevich v. Gordon R. Finch, et al.

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2022-01-07
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: case-settlement civil-contempt evidentiary-hearing judicial-estoppel judicial-procedure least-intrusive-remedy mootness supreme-court-precedent trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2022-03-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state courts failed to dismiss a civil contempt that was decided during trial, which conflicts with three decisions of the Supreme Court requiring the least intrusive remedy

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW The state courts have failed to dismiss a civil contempt that was decided during trial. The case was later settled. The failure conflicts with three decisions of this Court, Gompers v. Buck’s Stove and Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 452, 31 S.Ct. 492, 55 L.Ed. 797 (1911); Shillitani v. U.S., 384 U.S. 364, 372, 86 S.Ct. 1531, 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966); and Spallone v. U.S., 493 U.S. 265, 280, 110 S.Ct. 625, 107 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990) requiring the least intrusive remedy. All three of these decisions vacated civil contempt fines after the cases settled or the term had expired. (i)

Docket Entries

2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2021-12-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 7, 2022)

Attorneys

Robert E. Kovacevich
Robert E. Kovacevich — Petitioner
Robert E. Kovacevich — Petitioner