No. 21-988

Marla Crawford v. Henrico County Public School Board, et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-01-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim due-process en-banc-review governmental-immunity procedural-severance rehearing-en-banc section-1983 severance standing supplemental-jurisdiction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Takings
Latest Conference: 2022-05-19 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit error by refusal to pole the rehearing en bac and affirming the US District Court not to sever to Dr. Marla Faith Crawford under Rule 21 that creates a separate suit under 1983

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1) Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit error by refusal to pole the rehearing en bac and affirming the US District Court not to sever to Dr. Marla Faith Crawford under Rule 21 that creates a separate suit . under 1983 and render independent actions as in Gomez v. Dept. of the Air Force, 869 F.2d 852, 859 (5th Cir. 1989 and in Ail v.Eli Lilly & Co, 2015 US. District : . (S.D. Indiana September 29, 2015)...keeping Plaintiffs clams join will have little to no positive impact on ; . . each...Court severed the Plaintiffs...final adjudication __ was imposed separately? 2) Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit error in ; upholding the Motion To Severe Moot? 3) Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit erred in ‘ affirming that the Plaintiff has no constitutional claim? 4) Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit erred in : affirming that as agents of the school board, Dr. Kinlaw and Mr. Eggleston had immunity as government officials in violation of VA Code 22.1-71...” obligations and responsibilities imposed upon school boards by law and...may be sued...”? 5) Did the Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit erred by affirming the District Court declining to exercise / supplemental jurisdiction? | 6) Did the. Appeals Court of the Fourth Circuit in affirming the dismissal the remaining claims within the Plaintiffs complaint claim based on the behavior of Lucas? | II. List of Parities . All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all

Docket Entries

2022-05-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-05-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/19/2022.
2022-04-12
2022-03-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-02-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
2022-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent L. Neil Steverson to respond filed.
2022-01-20
Waiver of right of respondents Shannon Taylor, Tania Kregar to respond filed.
2021-09-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 11, 2022)

Attorneys

L. Neil Steverson
Andrew Nathan FergusonOffice of the Attorney General, Respondent
Marla Crawford
Marla Faith Crawford — Petitioner
Shannon Taylor, Tania Kregar
Theodore I. BrennerFreeborn & Peters LLP, Respondent