No. 22-1012
Janet Austen v. Franklin Herman
Tags: alimony alimony-calculation appeals appellate-review family-law income-calculation income-determination judicial-discretion marital-dissolution permanent-alimony trial-court
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the appeals court correct in upholding the trial judge's alimony decision despite miscalculating the recipient's monthly income?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Most importantly, if the trial Judge miscalculated the alimony recipient’s monthly income (or pay) was it right for the appeals court to uphold her decision? Should permanent alimony be discontinued when the person receiving the alimony is 68 years old} was married for 24 years and was not responsible for the demise of the marriage? The person paying the alimony dissipated $983,915.00 (
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-18
Brief of respondent Franklin Herman in opposition filed.
2023-02-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 18, 2023)
Attorneys
Franklin Herman
David C. Gardner — Gardner Law Firm, PC, Respondent
David C. Gardner — Gardner Law Firm, PC, Respondent