No. 22-1013
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process impartial-judge judicial-bias judicial-impartiality liberty-interest north-carolina-law trial-judge trial-procedure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the right to an impartial judge is violated when the trial judge also performs the role of the advocate for incarceration
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when a person’s liberty is at stake, the right to an impartial judge guaranteed by the Due Process Clause is violated where the trial judge also performs the role of the advocate for incarceration.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Reply of petitioner J.R. filed.
2023-06-20
Brief of respondent North Carolina in opposition filed.
2023-05-19
Response Requested. (Due June 20, 2023)
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-10
Waiver of right of respondent North Carolina to respond filed.
2023-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 18, 2023)
2023-02-08
Application (22A722) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until April 17, 2023.
2023-02-02
Application (22A722) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 16, 2023 to April 17, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
J.R.
Stuart Banner — UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Petitioner
Stuart Banner — UCLA School of Law Supreme Court Clinic, Petitioner
North Carolina
James Wellner Doggett — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent
James Wellner Doggett — North Carolina Department of Justice, Respondent