No. 22-1037

Howard Center v. AFSCME Local 1674, et al.

Lower Court: Vermont
Docketed: 2023-04-25
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: arbitration-review civil-rights disciplinary-sanctions due-process federal-regulations health-privacy healthcare-regulation hipaa hipaa-privacy-rule patient-privacy workforce-compliance workforce-sanctions
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity HealthPrivacy Privacy
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a covered entity must ensure HIPAA Privacy Rule compliance by its workforce, adopt a sanction policy, and apply appropriate sanctions against non-compliant employees

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Pursuant to federal regulations collectively known as “the HIPAA Privacy Rule,” must a covered entity like the Howard Center ensure compliance therewith by its workforce, adopt a sanction policy, and apply appropriate sanctions against all members of its workforce who fail to comply? II. Did the Arbitrator manifestly disregard the law by prohibiting the Howard Center from imposing even minimal discipline on an employee, who indisputably violated patient privacy in violation of federal law, when “appropriate sanctions” are mandatory under the HIPAA Privacy Rule?

Docket Entries

2023-05-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-01
Waiver of right of respondent AFSCME Local 1674, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-20

Attorneys

AFSCME Local 1674, et al.
Jacob Raffel KarabellBredhoff & Kaiser, P.L.L.C., Respondent
Jacob Raffel KarabellBredhoff & Kaiser, P.L.L.C., Respondent
Howard Center Inc.
Kevin John CoyleMcNeil, Leddy & Sheahan, P.C., Petitioner
Kevin John CoyleMcNeil, Leddy & Sheahan, P.C., Petitioner