No. 22-1042

Lauren Andersen v. British Airways PLC, et al.

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2023-04-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: brady-act civil-rights court-procedure due-process in-forma-pauperis judicial-bias judicial-disqualification judicial-review political-affiliation standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is it fitting for three Democrat judges from a district court and a panel of three Democrat judges from an appellate court to decide a case that has, almost entirely Democrat defendants?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Is it fitting for three Democrat judges from a district court and a panel of three Democrat judges from an appellate court to decide a case that has , almost entirely Democrat : especially when one of them is the sitting New York State Attorney General? Is such an unusual situation grounds for transfer to another circuit? Did the panel err in applying the in forma pauperis (I.F.P.) statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915, to this case, since I, the had paid the court fees, had never been in prison and was not indigent? Was this a due process violation, given that it resulted in my not being heard at all? Did the panel err in failing to address the merits, or respond to any of the points raised in the ; appellate brief? (Inter alia, the excessive speed and brevity of the Decision revealed the District Court’s predetermined view of the case, leave to replead was not granted, the statement that the case is frivolous was false, among other false statements, and Decision : was issued before exhibits were fully filed.) Are the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention : Act of 1993 (18 U.S.C. §922) and the Intelligence Identities Protection Act (50 U.S.C. §421) unconstitutional? ii PARTIES The petitioner below) is Lauren Andersen. The respondents below) are British Airways (“B.A.”) PLC, Mr. Anthony Battista Esq., Condon & Forsyth LLP, Three ; John and Jane Doe B.A. employees;.Port Authority of New York & New Jersey; and Mr. Huntley Lawrence, Acting C.0.0., Ms. Karen T. Connelly, Assistant . . Director, O.1.G., Lt. Michelle Serrano, CCIU/OIG, Set. Danielle Liantonio, P.O. Michael Corwin, and Lt. Daniel Carbonaro; Northwell Health, Northwell ; Health Laboratories, Mr. Michael J. Dowling, C.E.O., Dr. Mark Russ, Dr. John Kane, Dr. Melissa Dudas, . Ms. Renee Lifshitz, Dr. Mitchell Shuwall, Dr. Bruce Levy, Ms. Marybeth McManus, John Doe emergency room supervisor, UnitedHealthcare Community Plan of New York, UnitedHealth Group, Ms. Madeline Harlan, One Jane Doe customer service agent, and Mr. Matthew P. Mazzola Esq., Robinson & Cole LLP; Former U.S. Congressman Peter T. King, Esq., Mr. Michael Schillinger, Esq., E.M.S. technician identified only as "Frank 50", John Doe supervisor, and The City of New York; Ms. Judith A. Pascale, Suffolk County Clerk, Mr. Jonathan B. Bruno, Esq., and Kaufman Borgheest & Ryan LLP, Mr. Daniel S. Ratner Esq., Mr. Daniel G. May, Esq., Mr. David A. Rosen, Esq., Ms. Rachel Bloom, Esq., Mr. Graham T. Musynske . Esq., and Heidell Pittoni Murphy & Bach LLP, Mr. Jeffrey Carucci, Director, Division of E-Filing, Mr. Justin Barry, Esq. Chief of Administration, and Ms. Sherrill Spatz, Esq., Inspector General, of the N.Y.S. Office of Court Administration; Mr. Bret Parker, Executive Director, and the N.Y.C. Bar Association, | iti Ms. Letitia A. James, Esq., New York State Attorney General (N.Y.S.A.G.), John Doe representative identified only as "Alex" of the N.Y.S.A.G’s office, and ~ John Doe supervisor. STATEMENT OF

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-04-24
2023-02-13
Application (22A726) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until April 27, 2023.
2023-02-01
Application (22A726) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 26, 2023 to April 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Lauren Andersen
Lauren Andersen — Petitioner