Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court Err when they Cited Penn Central v. New York City and failed to address Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, and Reahard v. Lee County on what constitutes reasonable, and what constitutes an investment backed expectation as per Reahard v. Lee County and its subsequent effect on the plaintiff.

Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court err when they refused to address the Arizona Property Rights Protection Act, diminished value, agreements that "Run With The Land" as it relates to the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and to plaintiffs 1983 claim.

Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court Err when they refused to address the Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure on vested rights as it relates to the 5th and 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution and to plaintiffs 1983 claim.

Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court abuse their discretion in dismissing all federal claims and the plaintiffs right to pursue his claims in the court of his choosing as per Knick v. Township of Scott.

Did the Arizona District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court err in their analysis of the takings claim?