No. 22-1058

John L. Roseman, Sr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1981 42-usc-1982 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-procedure pro-se-pleadings standing sua-sponte
Key Terms:
Arbitration SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2023-06-01
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether motion-initiated 'sua sponte' dismissal was proper

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether motion-initiated “sua sponte” dismissal ; of courts below in this case was proper, and in keeping ; with the fairness standards required by this Supreme Court for pro se pleadings; in essence as said standards are articulated by this Court generally, in Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 520-521 (1971) et.al. | Whether rulings of courts below constitute an infringement of Petitioner's rights under Due Process , Clauses of Constitution and related rights under 42 U.S.C § 1981(a)(1991); 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (1978); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and ‘ Whether Mortgage/Loan in this case should be , invalidated. :

Docket Entries

2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-04-21

Attorneys

John L. Roseman
John L. Roseman — Petitioner
John L. Roseman — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Barbara Anne SmithBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent
Barbara Anne SmithBryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent