No. 22-1058
John L. Roseman, Sr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Response Waived
Tags: 42-usc-1981 42-usc-1982 civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process judicial-procedure pro-se-pleadings standing sua-sponte
Latest Conference:
2023-06-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether motion-initiated "sua sponte " dismissal
of courts below in this case was proper, and in keeping
with the fairness standards required by this Supreme
Court for pro se pleadings; in essence as said standards
are articulated by this Court generally, in Haines v.
Kerner, 404 U.S. 520-521 (1971) et.al.
Whether rulings of courts below constitute an
infringement of Petitioner 's rights under Due Process
Clauses of Constitution and related rights under 42
U.S.C § 1981(a)(1991); 42 U.S.C. § 1982 (1978); Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and
Whether Mortgage/Loan in this case should be
invalidated.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether motion-initiated 'sua sponte' dismissal was proper
Docket Entries
2023-06-05
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-12
Waiver of right of respondent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. to respond filed.
2023-04-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2023)
Attorneys
John L. Roseman
John L. Roseman — Petitioner
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Barbara Anne Smith — Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP, Respondent