No. 22-1062
Hinkle Family Fun Center, LLC, et al. v. Michelle Lujan Grisham, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process government-servitude inverse-condemnation property-rights qualified-immunity section-1983 taking takings
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment Takings JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-06-08
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Tenth Circuit err in providing qualified immunity to Respondents for their actions to inversely condemn the property of the Petitioners to shutter their business and prohibit them from inviting the public to their property on pain of fines and imprisonment?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Did the Tenth Circuit err in providing qualified immunity to Respondents for their actions to inversely condemn the property of the Petitioners to shutter their business and prohibit them from inviting the public to their property on pain of fines and imprisonment?
Docket Entries
2023-06-12
Petition DENIED.
2023-05-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-15
Waiver of right of respondent MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, et al. to respond filed.
2023-04-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2023)
Attorneys
HINKLE FAMILY FUN CENTER, LLC, et al.
Aubrey Blair Dunn — Western Agriculture, Resource and Business , Petitioner
MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM, et al.
Holly Agajanian — Office of Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, Respondent