No. 22-1075
James E. Hinkle v. Ron Neal, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: 6th-amendment confrontation-clause criminal-procedure due-process evidence federal-precedent impeachment impeachment-evidence witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the right to confrontation was denied
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s decision was contrary to federal precedent when it held that Hinkle’s federal right to confrontation was not denied when Indiana courts prevented him from impeaching the alleged victim’s testimony?
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-05
Waiver of right of respondent Ron Neal, Warden to respond filed.
2023-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)
Attorneys
James Hinkle
Russell Wayne Brown Jr. — The Region Lawyers, Inc., Petitioner
Russell Wayne Brown Jr. — The Region Lawyers, Inc., Petitioner