Whether Supreme Court of Georgia and Court of Appeals of Georgia erred by violating their own longstanding precedent

QUESTIONS PRESENTED Following longstanding precedent promotes predictability in the law and protects people who have come to rely on past decisions as a guide for their behaviors. Judges are generally bound to follow these precedential decisions and apply the same Legal reasoning of those prior cases. Each court system operates Under the common law system, which is based on Precedents. Precedents are rooted in the doctrine of stare decisis, which is a Latin phrase meaning “to stand by things decided”. The United States Supreme Court applies the doctrine of stare decisis by following the rules of its prior decisions to overrule precedent. The Common law system is premised on the idea of having predictable and consistent outcomes to cases ii with similar facts and legal issues questions. The questions presented: 1. Whether Supreme Court of Georgia and Court of Appeals of Georgia erred by violating their own longstanding precedent setting Case decisions and wellestablished Statutes of cases they have reviewed in violation of O.C.G.A.§9-11-42 and 0.C.G.A...§9-15-14 which now requires this Court to exercise its supervisory powers? 1. Is the Constitution’s guarantee of a fundamentally fair trial Compromised when Supreme Court of Georgia and Court of Appeals of Georgia Affirmed this case granting Attorney fees without conducting an evidentiary hearing in effect : stripping Petitioner of her property which violates her due process rights under the 5th Amendment of the United States Constitution? 2. Did Court ; Appeals of Georgia abuse its discretion Affirming this case knowing that the Trial Court committed reversible errors by improperly consolidating and transferring this case in which there was insufficiency of service and without conducting a hearing or getting Consent or permission of both parties in violation and derivation of O.C.G.A.§9-1142?