No. 22-1080
City of Stockton, California, et al. v. Francisco Duarte
Amici (2)Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights civil-rights-claim criminal-procedure due-process heck-bar heck-v-humphrey nolo-contendere plea-bargaining plea-deal pretrial-diversion section-1983
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2023-06-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'Heck Bar' bars a 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 claim where the plaintiff pled nolo contendere as part of a plea deal
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the “Heck Bar,” which this Court created in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), bars a 42U.S.C. Section 1983 claim where the plaintiff is a criminal defendant who pled nolo contendere (no contest) as part of a plea deal where he agreed to perform terms through the criminal justice system in exchange for the criminal charges being dismissed upon successful completion of the terms.
Docket Entries
2023-06-26
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-05
Brief amici curiae of International Municipal Lawyers Association, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2023-05-31
Waiver of right of respondent Francisco Duarte to respond filed.
2023-05-31
Brief amici curiae of California State Sheriffs' Association, et al. filed.
2023-05-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 5, 2023)
Attorneys
Cal. State Sheriffs' Assoc., Cal. Police Chiefs Assoc., Cal Peace Officers' Assoc.
Scott William Davenport — Jones & Mayer, Amicus
City of Stockton, et al.
Dana Alan Suntag — Herum/Crabtree/Suntag, LLP, Petitioner
Francisco Duarte
Easha Anand — Stanford Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, Respondent
International Municipal Lawyers Association, California State Association of Counties, and League of California Cities
Nadia Ann Sarkis — Miller Barondess, LLP , Amicus