Did the Fifth Circuit deviate from paramountcy of Supremacy-Clause, federal-laws, final-pretrial-judgment, qualified-immunity, summary-judgment

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the Fifth Circuit deviate from paramountcy of Supremacy Clause, federal laws and this Court’s on-the merits-based final pretrial judgment precedent when it adopted the district court’s qualified immunity-based summary judgement in favor of a non-State, nongovernmental, non-open-enrollment Defendant and its employee, in the absence of a clearly established applicable law? 2. Did the Fifth Circuit diverge from accurate interpretation of the clearly established EEOC’s and TWC’s statute of ° limitations for Title VII, state-laws tort and § 1981 claims when it opined affirming the district court’s “time-barred” ground entry of summary judgment, unmindful of Appellant’s timely and distinctly filed lawsuit in federal and state courts? ii PARTIES TO THE PROCEDING Onoyom Ukpong is Petitioner here; was Appellant in the Fifth Circuit; and Plaintiff in the district court. International Leadership of Texas, and Karen Marx, * individually and in her official capacity as principal, are . Respondents here; were Appellees in the Fifth Circuit and Defendants in the district court.