Did the South Carolina Supreme Court's invalidation of Petitioner's contract based on its sudden adoption of a universal rule of decision constitute an impairment of the obligation of contracts in contravention of Art. I, Sec. 10 of the Constitution of the United States and this Court's decision in Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus, 438 U.S. 234 (1978)?

QUESTION PRESENTED Did the South Carolina Supreme Court’s invalidation of Petitioner’s contract based on its sudden adoption of a universal rule of decision constitute an impairment of the obligation of contracts in contravention of Art. I, Sec. 10 of the Constitution of the United States and this Court’s decision in Allied Structural Steel Co. v. Spannaus, 438 U.S. 234 (1978)?