Simonetta Vespucci Sutton v. Mountain High Investments, LLC, et al.
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the district court erred in denying petitioner's motion to remand
QUESTIONS PRESENTED | . : A. Whether The District Court Erred In Denying Petitioner’s Motion To Remand When The Respondent, Realty Shares Had Failed To Meet The Statutory a Requirement For Removal From The Wayne County Circuit Court To The Bi United States Federal District Court? Petitioner would answer “Yes” Respondent would answer “No” The District Court answered “No” . This Court should answer “Yes” B. Whether The District Court Erred In Denying Petitioner’s Request For A Default Judgment Against Respondent, Realty Shares? Petitioner would answer “Yes” Respondent would answer “No” The District Court answered “No” : This Court should answer “Yes” = C. Whether The District Court Erred In Granting Respondent, Realty Shares Reo, ; : LLC’S Motion To Dismiss? i Petitioner would answer “Yes” Respondent would answer “No” The District Court answered “No” This Court should answer “Yes” i . ii D. Whether The District Court Erred In Amending The Judgment In Favor Of Respondent, Petitioner And Against Petitioner, Simonetta Vespucci Sutton And The Claims In Petitioner’s Complaint Against Named Defendants Mountain High Investments, LLC, Inheritance Funding Group 1, LLC, Premium Homes Realty, LLC, And Bowman K. Mitchell Being Dismissed Without Prejudice? Petitioner would answer “Yes” : Respondent would answer “No” : The District Court answered “No” ; This Court should answer “Yes” i { i ; tii 7