Are catalogues advertising illegal machineguns and silencers fraudulent?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED’ _ 1. Are catalogues given to Petitioner ie: Global -. Sales Limited and‘Shotgan Néws fraudulently +. advertising for: salé.illegal machiniegun and si«* dence kits to Petitioner «ald the public? Cata~~ logties that state “No Federal * Registration or * + to ptitchase these items for _ sale, NO FFL REQUIRED TO PURCHASE? _ The lower courts. should have answered the — ‘© question pér Title 28 U.S.C:A.* Section 1331_‘+ Federal Question'and Title'28 U.S.C:A. ‘Section 2201 Creation .of Remedy — Chapter 151 Décla -ratory Judgment. ; . Are the machinegun and silencer kits advertis : -ed for sale in the catalogues given to Petitioner listed in the Coram Nobis / Title 28 U.S.C. 1331 of the Petition listed at pages 20 to 59, : Machine guns and silencers Regulated under & Title 18 and 26 U.S.C.A.? 2. Does the United States Department of Justice knowingly giving and distributing catalogues ad : -vertising through a fraud scheme and selling il° | legal machineguns and silencers to Petitioner ° . ; and the public violate the 29¢ Constitutional A; : . . mendment Rights of the persons illegally convict / -ed of purchasing those machineguns and silencers? ; 3. Does Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) 2 violate Petitioner’s 5 and 14th Constitutional Amendment Rights when used by Federal Courts and the United States Attorney’s office to stop his civil complaints. Complaints that have , a shown the Petitioner is innocent of the alleged crime in his criminal case? 4. Is the Petitioner a vexatious litigant by filing his . Habeas Corpus appeals and adding new evidence showing his actual innocence while the Courts continuously refuse. to answer any legal question raised on the motions for habeas corpus and appeals? : ; ; 5. Petitioner’s Coram Nobis should be Granted due to the facts of federal law show Petitioner's actual innocence? _ po,