Should Judges of Appellate Courts have the right to ignore, manipulate, or even destroy evidence in cases pending before them in support of the Federal Government?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1) Should Judges of Appellate Courts have the right to ignore, manipulate, or even destroy evidence in cases pending before them in support of the Federal Government? 2) Should the United States be permitted not to answer charges but insist upon the dismissal of a case against its government brought by a minority merely on the basis of the Federal Claims Court or Appeals Court for the Federal Circuit claiming that it “has no jurisdiction” when in , fact substantive evidence shows that the court does have jurisdiction. 3) Should the United States government deem itself a patenting authority by prejudging before a patent is granted using heretofore unused or undetermined methods of patent prosecution such as considering the race, gender, or health status of the inventor? 4) Should it then have the power to usurp patenting from the inventor and bestow the invention inward and upon itself as the default owner of the intellectual property based on its prejudgment? 5) Considering the previous question — is this not a conflict of interest by the federal government itself while violating rights of the inventor? ii QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued 6) Having committed these violations and others associated with the acts that could be classified as government tyranny and constitutional violations of a most virulent kind including but not limited to the following constitutional amend: ments: Amdts, I, IV, V, XIII, XIV the inventor is then denied a public, swift, and fair hearing by the Federal Claims Court and any other court cases related to the proceedings should the government remain in possession of the stolen personal property of the inventor? 7) Should city, state, and the federal government be allowed to commit violations related to the takings by the federal government and then be dismissed from accountability by the Courts and the Congress because the self awarded invention is worth trillions of dollars? 8) Is liability owed and duty of care to the inventor whose invention has been usurped by the government? 9) Should an Appeals Court that participated in a wrongly decided case of which the Court itself knows that the case is wrongly decided refuse to review the case so as not to reveal corruption in the government and misconduct of several of its judges? 10) Should the Court neglect or refuse to go about the business of the courts by defending | iii | QUESTIONS PRESENTED Continued misconduct on the part of the government and its judges in order to cover up the wrong doing? 11) When the Courts have failed in application , of law to stop violations in settled law by the gov| ernment that would negatively affect innovation | as well as rights of personal property law going , forward, should an Extraordinary Writ ensue? | | | | | | | , } iv