No. 22-1133

Hugh Martin, et al. v. Sandoval County, New Mexico, et al.

Lower Court: New Mexico
Docketed: 2023-05-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: due-process eminent-domain fifth-amendment inverse-condemnation just-compensation native-american-land-rights property-rights takings
Key Terms:
Takings FifthAmendment
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the New Mexico Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that cut Petitioner's off from obtaining just compensation from Respondent Sandoval County for its actions to inversely condemn the private property of Petitioners to relinquish that private property to Respondent Pueblo of Cochiti?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented is: Did the New Mexico Supreme Court err declining to review and rectify the decisions of the lower courts that cut Petitioner’s off from obtaining just compensation from Respondent Sandoval County for its actions to inversely condemn the private property of Petitioners to relinquish that private property to Respondent Pueblo of Cochiti?

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-08-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-07-17
Brief of respondent Pueblo of Cochiti in opposition filed.
Main DocumentOtherMain DocumentOther
2023-06-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 21, 2023.
2023-06-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 21, 2023 to July 21, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-05-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 21, 2023)
PetitionOtherPetitionOther

Attorneys

Martin, et al.
Aubrey Blair Dunn — Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advoca, Petitioner
Aubrey Blair Dunn — Western Agriculture, Resource and Business Advoca, Petitioner
Pueblo of Cochiti
Carl Bryant Rogers — Respondent
Carl Bryant Rogers — Respondent