Does 49 U.S.C. § 42121 provide the means to invalidate the exemption incorporated in 9 U.S.C. §1 and allow the deviation of the nondiscretionary duty commanded by 49 U.S.C. § 42121 with regard to the 49 USC. § 42121 complaint filed by Robert Steven Mawhinney?

QUESTION PRESENTED “Does 49 U.S.C. § 42121 provide the United States Department of Labor, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the . Ninth Circuit, or the United States District Court for the Southern District of California : the means to invalidate the exemption incorporated in 9 U.S.C. §1¢%... but nothing : ; herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or : any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.”), and, to allow the deviation of the nondiscretionary duty commanded by 49 U.S.C. § 42121 (“... a hearing on the record ... shall be conducted expeditiously”) with regard to the 49 USC. § 42121 complaint filed by Robert Steven Mawhinney (an interstate commerce operation worker)? i