No. 22-1140
Dr. Chinwe Offor v. Mercy Medical Center, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: burden-shifting civil-procedure civil-rights due-process fabrication forgery fraud hospital-records mcdonnell-douglas precedent sanctions summary-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit manifestly departed from this Court's precedent by holding that egregious and repetitive acts of forgery and fabrication of hospital records were mere excusable mistakes
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW I. Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit manifestly departed from this Court’s precedent by holding that egregious and repetitive acts of forgery and fabrication of hospital records were mere excusable mistakes. II. Whether the U.S Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit departed from it’s own precedent and this Court’s Precedent, when it failed to apply the Mcdonnell Douglas Burden shifting Mechanism.
Docket Entries
2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-08
Waiver of right of respondents Mercy Medical Center, et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 26, 2023)
Attorneys
Dr. Chinwe Offor
Ike Ebenezer Agwuegbo — Ike Agwuegbo & Co P.C., Petitioner
Ike Ebenezer Agwuegbo — Ike Agwuegbo & Co P.C., Petitioner
Mercy Medical Center, et al.
Tara Eyer Daub — Nixon Peabody LLP, Respondent
Tara Eyer Daub — Nixon Peabody LLP, Respondent