No. 22-1150

Josh Stein, Attorney General of North Carolina, et al. v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Fourth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-05-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (4) Experienced Counsel
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights due-process duty-of-loyalty employee-rights employment-law first-amendment free-speech newsgathering property-protection standing tort-law
Key Terms:
FirstAmendment Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-10-13 (distributed 4 times)
Related Cases: 22-1148 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Amendment prohibits applying state tort law against double-agent employees who gather information, including by secretly recording, in the nonpublic areas of an employer's property and who use that information to breach their duty of loyalty to the employer

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED The North Carolina Property Protection Act gives property owners a civil cause of action for certain torts committed in the nonpublic areas of their property. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 99A-2. It specifically bars employees from taking or recording information without authorization and using that information to breach their duty of loyalty to their employer. Id. § 99A2(b)(1), (2). A divided panel of the Fourth Circuit held that these prohibitions violate the First Amendment when applied to employees who have a “newsgathering” aim. The question presented is whether the First Amendment prohibits applying state tort law against double-agent employees who gather information, including by secretly recording, in the nonpublic areas of an employer’s property and who use _ that information to breach their duty of loyalty to the employer.

Docket Entries

2023-10-16
Petition DENIED.
2023-10-10
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/13/2023.
2023-10-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2023.
2023-08-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-08-23
2023-07-10
2023-06-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 9, 2023.
2023-06-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 10, 2023 to August 9, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-09
Response Requested. (Due July 10, 2023)
2023-06-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-05-30
Waiver of right of respondent People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2023-05-24

Attorneys

American Farm Bureau Federation, National Pork Producers Council, North Carolina Chamber Legal Institute, North Carolina Pork Council, and Southern Association of State Departments of Agriculture
Michael B. KimberlyMcDermott Will & Emery LLP, Amicus
Michael B. KimberlyMcDermott Will & Emery LLP, Amicus
Josh Stein, et al.
Ryan Young ParkNorth Carolina Department of Justice, Petitioner
Ryan Young ParkNorth Carolina Department of Justice, Petitioner
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc., et al.
David Samuel MuraskinFarmSTAND, Respondent
David Samuel MuraskinFarmSTAND, Respondent
Utah and 15 Other States
Christopher Alan BatesUtah Attorney General's Office, Amicus
Christopher Alan BatesUtah Attorney General's Office, Amicus