No. 22-1167

Baron Bond, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Frank Bond, et al. v. Roger D. Silk

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2023-06-02
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: accounting accounting-claim decedent-estate federal-jurisdiction judicial-jurisdiction marshall-precedent marshall-v-marshall probate-exception valuation
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-09-26
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a complaint seeking, or requiring, an accounting or valuation of the assets of a decedent's estate continues, in the wake of Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), to come within the ambit of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a complaint seeking, or requiring, an accounting or valuation of the assets of a decedent’s estate continues, in the wake of Marshall v. Marshall, 547 U.S. 293 (2006), to come within the ambit of the probate exception to federal jurisdiction. (i)

Docket Entries

2023-10-02
Petition DENIED.
2023-07-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
2023-06-29
Waiver of right of respondent Roger D. Silk to respond filed.
Main DocumentMain Document
2023-05-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 3, 2023)
PetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of ServicePetitionCertificate of Word CountProof of Service

Attorneys

Baron Bond and Howard B. Miller, Personal Representatives of the Estate of Frank Bond
Jeffrey E. Nusinov — Nusinov Smith LLP, Petitioner
Jeffrey E. Nusinov — Nusinov Smith LLP, Petitioner
Roger D. Silk
Jason Cyrulnik — Cyrulnik Fattaruso, Respondent
Jason Cyrulnik — Cyrulnik Fattaruso, Respondent