Harold Jean-Baptiste v. Department of Justice, et al.
DueProcess
Whether inexcusable error or neglect by U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether inexcusable error or neglect by U.S. . Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia to ; issue an improper Order stating the Court had no jurisdiction when the U.S. Court of Appeals has complete jurisdiction. The Order by U.S. Court of Appeals for the ; District Court of Columbia is inexcusable judicial error. The inexcusable judicial error of U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia is a judicial mistake because the case has complete jurisdiction for appeal under 28 U.S. Code § 1291, 28 U.S. Code § 1292 and 28 U.S. Code § 1295. The U.S. Court of Appeals made an error and also applied the law incorrectly by ignoring the fact the U.S. District Court dismissed the case without merit base on judicial bias and inexcusable neglect to not even heed to opposition review and direct violation of Local Civil Rules 7(b). The U.S. Court of Appeals should have issued an order of default judgment since the respondents failed to respond in 21 days after the application for enforcement was filed and no notice of appearance according to Cir. Rules US. ‘Court of Appeals for District of Columbia Circuit rule 12 and 15(b)(2) The U.S. Court of Appeals accepted the error of the U.S. District Court for the District Court of Columbia when it should have overturned the U.S. District Court error in judgment. The U.S. Court of Appeals denied petitioner’s right to petition and due process because the case has jurisdiction for appeal, the inexcusable neglect of the U.S. Court of Appeals diminishing the guiding foundation for the Judicial LA ii QUESTION PRESENTED—Continued System, that the rule of law matters and to obstruct the rule of law would derail the guiding principles of foundation the Judicial System was built on. This petition is submitted to the Supreme Court as a result of : the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Co~ lumbia applied the law incorrectly, denial of First Amendment Right to Petition, error, mistake, inexcusable neglect, and public interest for U.S. Court of Appeals hold anyone accountable for violation of Human Rights, Constitutional and Federal Laws. The right to due process and fair judicial review should not be congested or disregarded by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District Court of Columbia and pray the Supreme Court reinstate the importance of the integrity of the Judicial System. wal iii ADDITIONAL