No. 22-118

Marquis Shaw v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-08
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (12) Experienced Counsel
Tags: acquitted-conduct constitutional-rights criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy due-process issue-preclusion jury-trial sentencing united-states-v-watts
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2023-06-29 (distributed 12 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the use of acquitted conduct at sentencing violates the Jury Clauses or Due Process Clause

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED (1) Do either the Jury Clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial? If necessary to reach an affirmative answer, should this Court’s decision in United States v. Watts, 519 U.S. 148 (1997) (per curiam), be overruled? (2) In avoidance of the constitutional question, do the rules of issue preclusion, as applied in federal criminal cases, bar imposition of an aggravated sentence on a factual predicate necessarily rejected by the jury at trial in the same case? i LIST OF ALL PARTIES The caption of the case in this Court contains the names of all parties (petitioner Shaw and respondent United States). LIST OF

Docket Entries

2023-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2023-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
2023-06-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
2023-06-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
2023-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
2023-05-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-09
Rescheduled.
2023-04-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
2023-04-06
Letter of petitioner filed.
2023-01-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/20/2023.
2023-01-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2023-01-03
Rescheduled.
2022-12-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/6/2023.
2022-12-08
Rescheduled.
2022-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-18
2022-11-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2022-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 7, 2022.
2022-09-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 7, 2022 to November 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 7, 2022.
2022-08-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 7, 2022 to October 7, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 7, 2022)
2022-05-20
Application (21A747) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until August 1, 2022.
2022-05-18
Application (21A747) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 2, 2022 to August 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Marquis Shaw
Peter Goldberger — Petitioner
Peter Goldberger — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent