Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Mandate infringe on the Fourteenth Amendment and imposes restrictions as to U.S. Code: Title 11, SUBCHAPTER I—OFFICERS, ADMINISTRATION, AND THE ESTATE (§§ 1301 - 1308) and SUBCHAPTER II—THE PLAN (§§ 1321 - 1330) the exercise of discretion when their opinions conflicting in nature have created premature judgments with judicial overreach as to not "safeguarding not only ongoing proceedings, but potential future proceedings, " Klay, 376 F.3d at 1099, as well as to "protect or effectuate " their prior orders and judgments in conflict with 11 U.S.C. §521 and US Bankruptcy Court of Florida Southern Division Local Rule 2090-l(D)(E), in err citing Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007), Neidich v. Salas 783 F.3d 1215, 1216 (11th Cir. 2015) and Chambers v. NASCO, Inc, 501 U.S. 32, 45(1991).

Whether the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals Mandate infringes on the Fourteenth Amendment