No. 22-1200
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure forfeiture independent-obligation judicial-discretion legal-argumentation legal-forfeiture young-v-united-states
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2023-11-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the courts of appeals have an independent obligation to craft and consider forfeited legal arguments in criminal cases?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Do the courts of appeals, under Young v. United States, 315 U.S. 257 (1942), have an “independent obligation” to craft and consider forfeited legal arguments in criminal cases?
Docket Entries
2023-11-20
Petition DENIED.
2023-11-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
2023-10-31
Reply of petitioner Lee Jones filed. (Distributed)
2023-10-11
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2023-08-31
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including October 11, 2023.
2023-08-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 11, 2023 to October 11, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 11, 2023.
2023-07-21
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2023 to September 11, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-07-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 11, 2023.
2023-07-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 12, 2023 to August 11, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
2023-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 12, 2023)
2023-04-03
Application (22A861) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until June 9, 2023.
2023-03-30
Application (22A861) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 11, 2023 to June 9, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Lee Jones
Rajeev Muttreja — Jones Day, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent