No. 22-122
Philip Snyder v. Tenth Presbyterian Church
Tags: appellate-procedure appellate-review civil-procedure due-process factual-findings legal-review pennsylvania-law rule-of-law standard-of-review superior-court
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2022-10-14
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplication of a properly stated rule of law?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1) Did the decision of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania constitute erroneous factual findings and/or misapplication of a properly stated rule of law? i LIST OF ALL DIRECTLY
Docket Entries
2022-10-17
Petition DENIED.
2022-09-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/14/2022.
2022-09-08
Brief of respondent Tenth Presbyterian Church in opposition filed.
2022-07-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 8, 2022)
Attorneys
Philip Snyder
Faye Riva Cohen — Law Office of Faye Riva Cohen, P.C., Petitioner
Tenth Presbyterian Church
Gary M. Samms — Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell and Hippel LLP, Respondent