Whether a petitioner must show he suffers from a 'civil disability' before a court can grant a writ of error coram nobis

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a petitioner must show he suffers from a “civil disability’—that is, a collateral consequence that causes a substantial and present harm, is specific to the criminal context, and arises solely from the erroneous conviction— before a court can grant a writ of error coram nobis, as the First, Second, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits have held, or whether a court may instead presume that every conviction has collateral consequences that provide adequate standing to seek relief, as the Fourth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits have held. (i)