When one learns the practice of law limited through experiential learning because they have been deprived of their 14th-Amendment-rights and many other rights by State-Actors, do they have a right to function as a lawyer in the same way as lawyers that have trained in law-school and passed-the-Bar?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1, When one learns the practice of law limited through experiential learning because they have been deprived of their 14> Amendment ' Rights and many other rights by State Actors do they have has a right to function as a lawyer in the same way as lawyers that have trained : : : in law school and passed the Bar? 2. In cases where are deeply resourced and have a history of ; meddling into the affairs of others by influencing them to break the law without ‘ boundaries establishing there is a very high likelihood they will illegally meddle into the affairs of any council assigned to represent minor children and likely compel them to undermine the case does that provide a basis ; for a parent with nontraditional attorney ' training to represent their child? , ii 3. In cases where the development of a case is determined by the efforts of a single individual, Roger Swartz, where it would be impossible for any other individual to develop the case without the individual, Roger Swartz, largely ; writing the entire dispute for the lawyer does that present such an onerous burden on the both the individual Roger Swartz, and the rs . lawyer that the individual, Roger Swartz in this instance, should have a right to represent their minor children in the same case? 4, Is there no means for which a court may use to assess the competence of an individual to : adequately represent another in a tort case seeking financial damages, not reimbursement, other than a degree from an accredited law school? 5. In cases where it is virtually impossible for a party to bring a suit forward at any point in the future without the parent developing the case for which the parent is a separate party in the case is the parent entitled to represent the child in a tort case seeking financial damages, : not reimbursement? 6. Can a parent represent a child in a tort case seeking financial damages if that tort case , relates to ensuring financial damages are awarded as a means to avert developmental : : harm caused by _ specific a precedent that is superior to iti any tort suit-council requirement, caused by the actions of 7. Can a parent represent a child in a tort case if the outcome of the child’s tort case seeking ; financial damages is entirely determined by : the parent’s self-representation of the identical / : tort suit that the parent is seeking for themselves and where the is no possible additional advantage for the minor to have representation not by the parent? iv , .