No. 22-185

Mandy Mobley Li v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Lower Court: District of Columbia
Docketed: 2022-08-30
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure-act agency-action circuit-split internal-revenue-service judicial-review statutory-interpretation tax-court-jurisdiction tax-relief-and-health-care-act-of-2006 united-states-tax-court whistleblower-award
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Securities
Latest Conference: 2022-10-28
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether threshold rejections of whistleblower award requests are immune from the judicial review process established through the Administrative Procedure Act

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED a Section 704 of the Administrative Procedure Act subjects final agency actions to mandatory judicial , review if no other adequate remedy exists in any court. When Congress enacts a specific remedy where . previous remedies were tenuous, the remedy provided is generally regarded as exclusive. The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 provides jurisdiction for the. ‘ United States Tax Court to review the denial of whistleblower award applications. ; The questions presented are: 1. Whether threshold rejections of whistleblower : award requests are immune from the judicial , review process established through . the Administrative Procedure Act 2. Whether 26 U.S.C. § 7623 grants jurisdiction to the United States Tax Court to review rejections made under § 7623(a) : 3. Whether the Whistleblower Office of the Internal . Revenue Service may avoid its statutory and | regulatory responsibilities by rejecting claims for award . pe : . 1 . | RELATED CASES : Li v. Comm’r, No. 5070-19W, U.S. Tax Court. Judgment entered April 6, 2020. : Liv. Comm ’r, No. 20-1245, US. Court of Appeals for the.,.District of Columbia Circuit. Judgment . entered January 11, 2022. Denial of motion for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc entered March 18,. : 2022. . a . |

Docket Entries

2022-10-31
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022.
2022-09-28
Waiver of right of respondent CIR to respond filed.
2022-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2022)

Attorneys

CIR
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Mandy Li
Mandy Mobley Li — Petitioner
Mandy Mobley Li — Petitioner