Igor Lukashin v. Washington State Department of Revenue
DueProcess
Whether a state court may enter a filing bans or pre-filing review order with no pre-deprivation notice or post-deprivation opportunity to be heard
QUESTIONS PRESENTED eg . 1. Whether a state court may enter a filing tans t i ban (or a pre-filing review order) with no cue ty Guk pre-deprivation notice or post-deprivation , opportunity to be heard; if not, whether it : should be summarily GVRed for violating Due Process 2. Whether this Court should adopt CA9’s DeLong and / or CA2’s Safir standard to establish the Due Process floor before filing bans or pre-filing review orders are ; entered against pro se nonlawyer litigants. 8. Whether, in light of the Court’s intervention precedents last term, a pro se nonparty nonlawyer may attempt to intervene post-decision on appeal in state or federal courts to point out inequitable treatment or seek an authoritative and binding interpretation of legal issues the parties raised but no longer have an interest in advancing or defending? 4. Must an order denying intervention post; decision on appeal provide a statement of reasons? . : ii