No. 22-191

Alma Aracely Castaneda-Martinez v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2022-08-30
Status: GVR
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Relisted (3) Experienced Counsel
Tags: None
Latest Conference: 2023-05-25 (distributed 3 times)

Question presented not available.

Docket Entries

2023-07-03
Judgment issued.
2023-05-30
Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of <i>Santos-Zacaria</i> v. <i>Garland</i>, 598 U. S. ___ (2023).
2023-05-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
2023-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
2023-05-11
Supplemental brief of petitioner Alma Aracely Castaneda-Martinez filed. (Distributed)
2022-11-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/9/2022.
2022-11-17
Reply of petitioner Alma Aracely Castaneda-Martinez filed.
2022-11-15
Memorandum of respondent Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General filed.
2022-11-09
Waiver of the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition under 15.5 filed by petitioner.
2022-10-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 15, 2022.
2022-10-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 31, 2022 to November 15, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-10-04
Supplemental brief of petitioner Alma Aracely Castaneda-Martinez filed.
2022-09-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 31, 2022.
2022-09-29
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.
2022-09-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 29, 2022 to October 31, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.
2022-08-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 29, 2022)
2022-05-19
Application (21A739) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until August 12, 2022.
2022-05-16
Application (21A739) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 15, 2022 to August 12, 2022, submitted to Justice Thomas.
2022-05-16
Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system.

Attorneys

Alma Aracely Castaneda-Martinez
R. Trent McCotterBoyden Gray & Associates PLLC, Petitioner
R. Trent McCotterBoyden Gray & Associates PLLC, Petitioner
Cato Institute
Jonathan Yates EllisMcGuireWoods LLP, Amicus
Jonathan Yates EllisMcGuireWoods LLP, Amicus
Garland, Merrick
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent