Grant S. Kim v. Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
Whether the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) protects an active military servicemember from a default judgment resulting in the loss of real property by eminent domain
QUESTIONS PRESENTED .--Re: 14 Days -MEMORANDUM Filed date June 29, 2022. US Postal stamp date July 12, 2022. (Tuesday). T received date July 15, 2022 (Friday), already passed the within 14 days. Question: How to stop this kind malice practice? -Re: MANDATE -; Question: So, I lost my right to get rehearing. -Re: Jurisdiction -(Petitioner) filed a SUMMONS at US District Court on April 12, 2021, Case . The reason: Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) is Federal Law. Question: If Grant S. Kim Case lose, then which Court, do I have to go? --Re: Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) --Default judgment against (Grant S. Kim) active military servicemember that to | lose ownership of real property by eminent domain. ; . Question: Why Service member was not protected by (SCRA) during active military service? . -Re: Eleventh Amendment immunity -The Superior Court, County of Riverside, Case #RIC1903610, Judge, CHAD W. FIRETAG did violation of my right as states in (SCRA). Question: Why violated judgments Case be protected by Eleventh Amendment immunity? | , -Re: Name of Respondent -MEMORANDUM filed June 29, 2022 and MANDATE filed July 21, 2022 shows . Defendant-Appellee is SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF , | RIVERSIDE, Executive Office. ii . | |