No. 22-245
Abolfazl Hosseinzadeh v. Bellevue Park Homeowners Association, et al.
Tags: civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction federal-question federal-question-jurisdiction motion-practice pendent-claims pendent-state-law-claims privilege-law related-proceedings summary-judgment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-11-18
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Where a federal district court exercises federal question jurisdiction, does state or federal privilege law apply over pendent state law claims?
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented are: 1. Where a federal district court exercises federal question jurisdiction, does state or federal privilege law apply over pendent state law claims? 2. May a party file a second motion for summary judgment after the denial of its initial summary judgment motion, where no additional facts have come to light?
Docket Entries
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-04
Reply of petitioner Abolfazl Hosseinzadeh filed. (Distributed)
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-13
Brief of respondents Bellevue Park Homeowners Association, et al. in opposition filed.
2022-09-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2022)
2022-07-21
Application (22A56) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 10, 2022.
2022-07-19
Application (22A56) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 11, 2022 to September 10, 2022, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Abolfazl Hosseinzadeh
Andrew Brooks Greenlee — Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Petitioner
Andrew Brooks Greenlee — Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A., Petitioner
Bellevue Park Homeowners Association, et al.
Andrew James Kinstler — Helsell Fetterman LLP, Respondent
Andrew James Kinstler — Helsell Fetterman LLP, Respondent