No. 22-258

Wayne B. Holstad, et al. v. Department of Labor

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2022-09-20
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-law agency-authority civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-interpretation due-process judicial-review statute-of-limitations takings
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration ERISA DueProcess WageAndHour Privacy
Latest Conference: 2022-11-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a statute of limitations is a due process requirement, and if so, what statute of limitations is applicable to this case?

Question Presented (from Petition)

question presented is whether a statute of limitations is a due process requirement, and if so, what statute of limitations is applicable to this case? 2. Does an administrative agency have the authority to expand the definition of which persons are subject to a statute, based upon the agency’s erroneous interpretation of court precedent, when that authority was not expressly delegated by Congress. 3. Does the Sixth Amendment require that anonymous, hearsay testimony be excluded in a proceeding in which significant monetary sanctions and a debarment penalty can be imposed? |

Docket Entries

2022-11-14
Petition DENIED
2022-11-14
Petition DENIED.
2022-10-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/10/2022.
2022-10-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States Department of Labor to respond filed.
2022-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 20, 2022)

Attorneys

United States Department of Labor
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent
Wayne B. Holstad and Northwest Title Agency, Inc.
Wayne B. Holstad — Petitioner
Wayne B. Holstad — Petitioner