1. Whether Orders requiring the turn over of the cell phones themselves for cloning and global searching are Orders having the practical effect of granting or denying an injunction due to the serious, perhaps irreparable, privacy consequences under this Court's decision in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373, 378-379, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014), regarding the privacy interests in cell phones?

2. Whether this Court's decision in Riley v. California, 573 U.S. 373, 378-379, 134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014), regarding the privacy interests in cell phones, precludes the entry of sua sponte Orders forcing a civil litigant to turn over her cell phone, and the cell phones of her three co-worker witnesses, for cloning and global searching when no showing at all was required or made to justify the entry of those Orders?

Whether orders requiring the turn over of cell phones for cloning and global searching have the practical effect of granting or denying an injunction due to serious privacy consequences