Whether application of the contempt analysis associated with Utah R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions to review a Utah R. Civ. P. 83 Vexatious Litigant order is fundamentally flawed

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether application of the contempt analysis associated with Utah R. Civ. P. 11 sanctions to : review a Utah R. Civ. P. 83 Vexatious Litigant order is fundamentally flawed due to lack of the safe harbor which merits the extension of jurisdiction beyond the dismissal of the : complaint when appropriately done per Rule ; 41? 2. Whether the Court of Appeals self-identified lack of jurisdiction makes any determination on : ; the merits problematic especially by a clear and ; convincing standard? ; 3. Whether Rule 11 framework is appropriate given the Petitioner never received a letter ; under Rule 11? 4. Whether the Rule 11 framework as applied to ; Rule 83 analysis means that all of Rule 11 : should be applicable and Petitioner withdrew the alleged Offending Motions allows preclusion of Rule 11 sanction? ; 5. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a de novo : assessment claims that matured as 100% of : the work was done under the AAA agreement? 6. Cana Utah state Court bar claims pending in federal Court based on AAA? 7. Whether a moot case resuscitates after a voluntary dismissal? ii A,