No. 22-279
Norine Cave v. Suvidha Sachdeva, et al.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment daubert daubert-standard directed-verdict discovery discovery-requirements due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference:
2023-01-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a litigant's fundamental right to a fair trial is unjustly deprived by a directed verdict preceding discovery and Daubert requirements
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether a litigant’s fundamental right to a fair trial, under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, is unjustly deprived where a directed verdict precedes discovery and gatekeeping requirements under Daubert. | @ e ii |
Docket Entries
2023-01-17
Rehearing DENIED.
2022-12-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
2022-12-16
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2022-11-21
Petition DENIED.
2022-11-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/18/2022.
2022-10-17
Waiver of right of respondent Suvidha Sachdeva, et al. to respond filed.
2022-09-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 24, 2022)
Attorneys
Suvidha Sachdeva, et al.
Melton B, Satcher III — Satcher & McGovern LLC, Respondent
Melton B, Satcher III — Satcher & McGovern LLC, Respondent